What Does Scripture Teach About Conflicting Moral Truths?

“Repent therefore and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out.” (Acts 3:19)

We have all been taught that any sin is a deadly sin, and but for repentance, it will send you to hell. The above verse certainly supports this spiritual truth. However, many of us have also been taught, wrongly I might add, that there are no degrees of sin. There certainly are degrees of sin and there are a number of verses in the Bible that point to why I would reach such a conclusion. For the sake of argument, I will provide one passage from the lips of Jesus himself:

“The master of that servant will come on a day when he is not looking for him, and at an hour when he is not aware, and will cut him in two and appoint him his portion with the unbelievers. And that servant who knew his master’s will, and did not prepare himself or do according to his will, shall be beaten with many stripes. But he who did not know, yet committed things deserving of stripes, shall be beaten with few. For everyone to whom much is given, from him much will be required; and to whom much has been committed, of him they will ask the more.” (Luke 12:46-48)

The greater spiritual question here, however, is what to do when there is a greater moral truth that would be served by committing one sin at the expense of ignoring another? Stay with me here. I never want to be perceived as encouraging sin. The truth is, however, that we all find ourselves in moral dilemmas where we must make choices, any one of which could be viewed as sinful. What’s the right thing to do on such cases?

I am not sure I can broadly answer such a question. In fact, it would not be appropriate for me without knowing more about the specific circumstances. However, there may some guidance in the Old Testament that at least supports that God recognizes that decisions like these occur in life. In Exodus 1, the Egyptian King was concerned about an exploding Hebrew population and commanded Hebrew midwives to kill every male newborn child. “When you do the duties of a midwife for the Hebrew women,” the king stated, “and see them on the birth stools, if it is a son, then you shall kill him; but if it is a daughter, then she shall live.” (Exodus 1:16)

The midwives refused to do as the king ordered, but when asked why, they lied to him about it. “So the king of Egypt called for the midwives and said to them, ‘Why have you done this thing, and saved the male children alive?’ And the midwives said to Pharaoh, ‘Because the Hebrew women are not like the Egyptian women; for they are lively and give birth before the midwives come to them.’” (Exodus 1:18-19)

Is it okay to lie to save a child? Both are sins in the eyes of God, but none of us would blame the Hebrew midwives for their chosen course of action. Apparently, God did not either because the Bible records, “Therefore God dealt well with the midwives, and the people multiplied and grew very mighty. And so it was, because the midwives feared God, that he provided households for them.” (Exodus 1:20-21)

Don’t let anyone tell you that any and all of life’s choices can be made free of sin. It is simply not true. The Apostle Paul clearly pointed out in his own life that he often did not understand his own actions. “O wretched man that I am!” the Apostle proclaimed. (Romans 7:24)

There are times that we must choose the more righteous course of action. As long as we have peace about it and repent of it, God will continue to love us. On that point, there can be no debate!

Share on Facebook

You may also like

2 Comments

  1. I agree completely that not all sins are equal, that’s just nonsense. However, I think something must be missing or incomplete here. Using the example of the Egyptian midwives, ask the simple question, “What was God’s will for them at the time?”

    Whether “sin” means what’s morally wrong or that which opposes the will of God, it is self-contradictory to say that the midwives did the right thing by sinning. It’s self-contradictory to say that God approved of what they did although it was a sin.

    It seems to me there are these possibilities:
    * Lying was the right thing to do in the circumstances, hence not a sin;
    * Lying was the wrong thing to do, i.e. not God’s will, hence sinful, and there was a better alternative. Then God’s approval was a merciful recognition that the midwive’s sin was “for a good cause” and the result of limited knowledge, wisdom, or strength to do what really was God’s will.

    To say that there are times we must sin means that, on those occasions, God wants us to sin. Again, it makes no sense.

    Rather, I think the solution must be
    * a form of ethical absolutism (“never lie, whatever the consequences”),
    * a ranking of moral laws, such that, for example, saving a life outweighs truth-telling, or
    * an acceptance that maxims such as “never lie” are starting points or generalizations rather than universal absolutes. We don’t seem to have a problem with this when it comes to the commandment “Do not kill,” and I think lying is in the same category.

    Mike Blyth
    Jos, Nigeria

  2. I find your argument sound and biblical. However, I am not sure if there are degrees of sin, there are many Christians who believe in different degrees of sin, one being more sinful the other. Sin is defined as disobedience to God’s Laws. As matter of fact, we can not define or know sin if it was not for the law, Apostle Paul says in Romans.
    I also agree with you that I am not suer if the midwives example is a good example. The Bible needs to be taken as a whole therefore, if we are to draw a conclusion, it must be in line with all other passages, since we believe that the Bible is not contradictory, or conflicts each other. For instance, paul talks about the law being hung on the cross, yet in the same book he talks about how sin can not be defined (exists) without the law of God.
    Now, how should we understand Jesus’s Commands saying let your words be Yes, NO , and any other is from Satan. IF this passage taken alone, then we must conclude that the midwives in Egypt committed a sin and God seemed to be happy with it. in the same line, Jacob stole the birth right from his brother, yet God blessed him.
    Morally right is indeed a tough question, yet we know that God loves no matter what. Because we know that God hates sin, and not the person. God’s love is endless and unconditional.